1. Mineral Resources
  2. Online Spatial Data
  3. Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS)

Little Creek composite placer

Past Producer in Alaska, United States with commodities Gold, Silver, Tungsten
Map
XML
JSON
KML
B
Sections on this page
  1. Identification information
  2. Geographic coordinates
  3. Site location context
  4. Geographic areas
  5. Commodities
  6. Materials information
  7. Mineral occurrence model information
  8. Host and associated rocks
  9. Nearby scientific data
  10. Economic information about the deposit and operations
  11. Mining district
  12. Links to other databases
  13. Bibliographic references
  14. General comments
  15. Reporter information

Geologic information

Identification information

Deposit ID 10000555
MRDS ID A010762
Record type Site
Current site name Little Creek composite placer
Alternate or previous names Nome placer field

Geographic coordinates

Geographic coordinates: -165.40577, 64.54317 (WGS84)
Relative position The Little Creek composite placer gold deposit, largely mined, occupies large parts of sections 11, 12, 13, and 14, T. 11 S., R. 34 W., Kateel River Meridian. The map location is immediately north of the Nome-Teller road in the SE1/4SE1/4 section 11. The site is accurately located (Bundtzen and others, 1994, sheet 1). It is approximately the same as locality 138 of Cobb (1972 [MF 463]). In his description of location 138, Cobb lists Center, Flat, Holyoke, Lake, Saturday, Wonder, and Little Creek claims and two operating companies: Hammon Consolidated Gold Fields and U.S. Smelting and Refining Company. The field was also extensively mined by the Pioneer Mining Company. For convenience in this record, the composite placer deposit is hereafter referred to as the Nome placer field.

Site location context

Political divisions (FIPS codes)

Nome(Census area)

Alaska(state)

United States(country)

North America(continent)

Land(continent)

USGS map quadrangles

Nome C-1(quadrangle 1:63,360 scale)

Solomon NW(quadrangle 1:100,000 scale)

Nome(quadrangle 1:250,000 scale)

Hydrologic units (watersheds)

Nome(hydrologic unit)

Norton Sound(hydrologic accounting unit)

Northwest(hydrologic subregion)

Alaska(hydrologic region)

Federal lands

LG(Federal land areas administered by LG)

Geographic areas

Country State
United States Alaska

Commodities

Commodity Importance
Gold Primary
Silver Secondary
Tungsten Critical Secondary

Materials information

Materials Type of material
Arsenopyrite Ore
Gold Ore
Hematite Ore
Ilmenite Ore
Magnetite Ore
Pyrite Ore
Scheelite Ore
Garnet Gangue

Mineral occurrence model information

Model code 119
USGS model code 39a
Deposit model name Placer Au-PGE
Mark3 model number 54

Host and associated rocks

  • Host or associated Host
    Rock type Unconsolidated Deposit > Gravel

Nearby scientific data

(1) Qs
ListMap

Economic information

Comments on the geologic information

  • Geologic Description = This complex Nome placer field formed where the rich Anvil Creek (NM236) alluvial deposit was reworked by marine processes. An ancestral Anvil Creek channel flowed southeasterly, turned south near modern Center Creek (not named on the 1970 revision of the topographic map but probably the drainage near the northeast runway at the Nome airport), and eventually merged with Submarine Beach (NM285 and NM286). The field spreads out along the Third Beach (NM258). It is very wide southwest of Third Beach through the area of buried auriferous abrasion platforms seaward of Third Beach. The deposit includes a large part of the richest portion of Third Beach between Little Creek to the west and Dry Creek to the east (Moffit, 1906, p. 134; Moffit, 1907, p. 134-144; Collier and others, 1908, p. 34, 162-163). The general location of the deposit as it was recognized in 1906 can be inferred from patterns of gold distribution shown by (Collier and others, 1908, plate X).? the deposit is mainly developed on schist bedrock, but higher level gold concentrations occur in fan and delta-like deposits formed at those times when an ancient Anvil drainage flowed into the ocean. The rather complex relations were summarized by Metcalfe and Tuck, 1942, p. 37): 'At the foothill edge of the coastal plain is an indistinguishable zone of intermixed stream and marine deposits. . . In this area, gold is found throughout the overburden, in horizons, in small stream channels, and as disseminations. Marine and stream gravel is often intermixed. When the shoreline was close to the hills, Anvil, Cooper, and Dry Creeks emptied gold-bearing detritus directly into the sea. In part this material formed an alluvial fan deposit and, when deposited directly into the sea, a delta. . . . Under such conditions, gold distribution is very erratic. Further from the foothills the gold occurs in more regular horizons.'? the field was first worked by drifting by the Pioneer Mining Company, especially between 1904 and 1910. The average value of an almost continuous drift mine 3,000 feet in length was 4.51 dollars or 0.22 ounce of gold per bedrock foot. Some of the ground contained an ounce of gold to the bedrock foot (Metcalfe and Tuck, 1942, figure 1). The area was mined hydraulically by the Pioneer Company from 1910 to 1922 and then by Hammon and Fairbanks Exploration companies from 1923 until 1934. During the period from 1904 until 1934, about 8,000,000 dollars (387,000 ounces of gold) was recovered from the area. The field furnished a significant amount of production of the Nome district (Bundtzen and others, 1994). The deposit was subsequently dredged until 1965. It was last mined as an open pit in 1994.? Placer gold at Nome is very close to 900 fine; Anvil Creek averages 897 and ranges from 894 to 905 (Metcalfe and Tuck, 1942, p. 41). Garnet was relatively abundant near Third Beach; sulfides, principally pyrite and arsenopyrite, locally occured in concentrates seaward of Third Beach. In general, minerals in the concentrates are magnetite, ilmenite, scheelite, garnet, pyrite, and arsenopyrite. Based on testing done by Fairbanks Exploration Company in 1939, after stripping all available free gold with mercury, the sulfides appear to contain about 0.25 to 0.75 ounce of gold per ton. Metcalfe and Tuck (1942) strongly suggest that some of the gold, and therefore sulfides, could have come from marine erosion of the bedrock surface itself.
  • Age = Pliocene and Quaternary; sea-level fluctuations are very important in the history of this deposit.

Economic information about the deposit and operations

Development status Past Producer
Commodity type Metallic

Comments on exploration

  • Status = Probably inactive

Mining district

District name Nome

Comments on the production information

  • Production Notes = Production of about 8,000,000 dollars (387,000 ounces of gold) from 1904 to 1934 and extensive production after WW II.

Comments on the reserve resource information

  • Reserves = the area has been extensively mined and has few remaining conventional reserves.

Comments on the workings information

  • Workings / Exploration = A buried alluvial gold deposit was discovered in the canyon of Anvil Creek in 1898 by Lindblom, Brynteson, and Lindeberg, who later formed Pioneer Mining Company. The men also located placer claims on the coastal plain along an ancient buried channel of Anvil Creek that lies between Little and Dry Creeks. These claims covered important parts of the Nome placer field deposit. Extensive underground mining of this deposit occurred between 1904 and 1910. In late 1904, the Third Beach deposit (NM258) was discovered. In the Nome placer field area, the upland limit of the Third Beach deposit was sharp and against a bedrock escarpment. The beach deposits contributed to the richness of the ancient Anvil Creek channel, and related abrasion deposits were mined seaward from Third Beach. The deposit as finally mined includes the ancestral Anvil Creek channel, Third Beach, and abrasion and transient or remnant beaches on the abrasion platform offshore from Third Beach. After drifting, the deposit was mined by surface hydraulic methods, generally with hydraulic elevators, from 1910 to 1934; it was then dredged until 1965. Final production from the area, in the 1980's until 1994, was by open-pit operations that trucked ore to central washing plants. This long-mined field was probably the most important spatially continuous placer operation in the Nome mining district.

Reference information

Bibliographic references

Comments on the references

  • Primary Reference = Metcalfe and Tuck, 1942

General comments

Subject category Comment text
Deposit Model Name = Alluvial placer Au (Cox and Singer, 1986, model 39a); deltaic deposits, buried strandline beach deposits, and off-shore abrasion placers seaward from ancient beaches.

Reporter information

Type Date Name Affiliation Comment
Reporter 10-JUL-00 Hawley, C.C. Hawley Resource Group
Reporter 10-JUL-00 Travis L. Hudson Hawley Resource Group

Beyond USGS

Supplemental information added by qvyshift.com. Not part of the original USGS MRDS record.

Maps centered on this site

Authoritative Alaska resources

These are landing pages for further research — the state agencies don't currently expose per-mine deep links.