| Deposit ID | 10310669 |
|---|---|
| Record type | Region |
| Current site name | Pocket Belt Region |
| Geographic coordinates: | -120.4108, 37.99136 (WGS84) |
|---|---|
| Location accuracy | 100(meters) |
| Relative position | The Pocket Belt region encompasses a loosely defined area bounded on the west by Tuttletown, Sonora-Bald Mountain on the east, Columbia-Stanislaus River on the north, and Jamestown on the south. |
Political divisions (FIPS codes)
Tuolumne(county)
California(state)
United States(country)
North America(continent)
Land(continent)
USGS map quadrangles
Sonora(quadrangle 1:24,000 scale)
Oakdale(quadrangle 1:100,000 scale)
San Jose(quadrangle 1:250,000 scale)
Hydrologic units (watersheds)
Upper Tuolumne(hydrologic unit)
San Joaquin(hydrologic accounting unit)
San Joaquin(hydrologic subregion)
California(hydrologic region)
| Country | State | County |
|---|---|---|
| United States | California | Tuolumne |
| Meridian | Township | Range | Section | Fraction | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mount Diablo | 001N | 014E | California | ||
| Mount Diablo | 002N | 014E | California |
| Commodity | Importance |
|---|---|
| Gold | Primary |
| Silver | Secondary |
| Materials | Type of material |
|---|---|
| Gold | Ore |
| Telluride | Ore |
| Petzite | Ore |
| Sylvanite | Ore |
| Calaverite | Ore |
| Pyrite | Ore |
| Quartz | Gangue |
| Calcite | Gangue |
| Pyrite | Gangue |
| Chalcopyrite | Gangue |
| Galena | Gangue |
| Model code | 273 |
|---|---|
| USGS model code | 36a |
| Deposit model name | Low-sulfide Au-quartz vein |
| Mark3 model number | 27 |
| Host or associated | Host | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rock type | Metamorphic Rock | ||||
| Rock unit name | Calaveras Complex | ||||
| |||||
| Host or associated | Host | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rock type | Metamorphic Rock | ||
| Rock unit name | Sullivan Creek Terrane | ||
| |||
| Host or associated | Host | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rock type | Plutonic Rock > Granitoid > Granodiorite | ||
| |||
| Host or associated | Host | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rock type | Plutonic Rock > Mafic Intrusive Rock > Diorite | ||
| |||
| Host or associated | Host | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rock type | Plutonic Rock > Porphyry | ||
| Rock type qualifier | Porphyritic Igneous Rocks | ||
| |||
| (1) | Limestone of probable Paleozoic or Mesozoic age |
|---|
| General form | Tabular, pinch and swell |
|---|
| Operation type | Surface-Underground |
|---|---|
| Development status | Producer |
| Commodity type | Metallic |
| Deposit size | Large |
| Significant | Yes |
| Discovery year | 1850 |
| District name | Various |
|---|
| Ownership category | Private |
|---|---|
| Area name | Tuolumne County Planning Department |
| Ownership category | Private |
| Area name | City of Sonora |
| Ownership category | BLM Administrative Area |
| Area name | Folsom Field Office |
Clark, W. B., 1970, Gold districts of California: California Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 193, p. 121.
Clark. W. B., and Lydon, P.A., 1962, Mines and mineral resources of Calaveras County, California: California Division of Mines and Geology County Report No. 2, p. 72-73.
Earhart, R.L., 1988, Geologic setting of gold occurrences in the Big Canyon area, El Dorado County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1576, 13 p.
Higgins, C.T., 1997, Mineral land classification of a portion of Tuolumne County, California, for precious metals, carbonate rock, and concrete-grade aggregate: California Division of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 97-09, 85 p.
Julihn, C.E., and Horton, F.W., 1940, Mineral industries survey of the United States - Mines of the southern Mother Lode Region, Part II - Tuolumne and Mariposa counties: U.S. Bureau of Mines Bulletin 424, 179 p.
Knopf, A., 1929, The Mother Lode system of California: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 157, 88 p.
Koschmann, A.H., and Bergendahl, M.H., 1968, Principal gold-producing districts of the United States: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 610, 283 p.
Logan, C.A., 1949, Mines and mineral resources of Tuolumne County, California: California Journal of Mines and Geology, v. 45, no. 1, p. 47-83.
Schweickert, R.A., Hanson, R.E., and Girty, G.H., 1999, Accretionary tectonics of the Western Sierra Nevada Metamorphic Belt in Wagner, D.L. and Graham, S.A., editors, Geologic field trips in northern California: California Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 119, p. 33-79.
Tucker, W.B., 1916, Tuolumne County: California State Mining Bureau, 14th Annual Report of the State Mineralogist, p. 132-172.
Wagner, D.L. and others, 1981, Geologic map of the Sacramento Quadrangle, California: California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology Regional Geologic Map Series, Map No. 1A, scale 1:250,000.
Wagner, D.L., Bortugno, E.J., and McJunkin, R.D., 1990, Geologic map of the San Francisco-San Jose Quadrangle, California: California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology Regional Geologic Map Series, Map No. 5A, scale 1:250,000.
Zimmerman, J.E., 1983, The geology and structural evolution of a portion of the Mother Lode Belt, Amador County, California: Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Arizona, 138 p.
| Subject category | Comment text |
|---|---|
| Deposit | The Pocket Belt is characterized by widely separated, very narrow seams of quartz and calcite that swell in places to contain rich pockets of coarse gold. The deposits also contain telluride minerals including petzite, sylvanite, and calaverite. These deposits are noted for their small but spectacularly rich concentrations of gold, some of which is beautifully crystalline. The seams do not persist individually, but appear to be related to very minor, almost insignificant fissuring that was later invaded by rich gold-bearing solutions. Rich seams may persist for only a few feet. In some cases, the seams are associated with igneous dikes, such as at the Bonanza Mine. Some of these seams have been superimposed on older, less-rich gold-bearing mineralized zones typical of the Mother Lode Belt and East Belt. The Pocket Belt is distinct from ?typical? Sierran gold mineralization because the gold is present as a mix of native form and telluride minerals. The deposits do not show consistent enrichment in the ore shoots. Sulfides, although present typically as pyrite, are not as prominent as in the Mother Lode Belt and East Belt. Because the veins of quartz and calcite do not appear to be disturbed by later fissures and seams, these deposits probably formed very late in the regional sequence of gold mineralization. Also, the veins in the belt may represent a very localized source of enrichment compared to the areas of less-rich quartz-veining to the north and south. The above characteristics suggest that the origin of the Pocket Belt was relatively unique in the overall process of gold mineralization of the Sierra Nevada. These deposits have not been sufficiently studied, however, to conclusively establish their origin. Although tellurides most commonly form in lower-temperature environments, they can form also in higher-temperature environments. Because of the characteristics displayed by these deposits, they are genetically classified here as low-sulfide gold-quartz deposits, but the possibility that they may have originated by epithermal processes is not ruled out at this time. |
| Type | Date | Name | Affiliation | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporter | 22-AUG-2006 | Higgins, Chris T. | California Geological Survey CGS (Formerly CDMG) | |
| Editor | 01-SEP-2007 | Schruben, Paul G. | U.S. Geological Survey | Converted from S&A FileMaker format to Oracle. Edit checks on rocks, units, and ages with Geolex search, and other fields. |
Supplemental information added by qvyshift.com. Not part of the original USGS MRDS record.
These are landing pages for further research — the state agencies don't currently expose per-mine deep links.