| Deposit ID | 10310690 |
|---|---|
| Record type | District |
| Current site name | Volcano District |
| Geographic coordinates: | -120.63129, 38.44251 (WGS84) |
|---|---|
| Elevation | 627 |
| Location accuracy | 100(meters) |
| Relative position | The Volcano District is centered around the town of Volcano, California |
Political divisions (FIPS codes)
Amador(county)
California(state)
United States(country)
North America(continent)
Land(continent)
USGS map quadrangles
Pine Grove(quadrangle 1:24,000 scale)
San Andreas(quadrangle 1:100,000 scale)
Sacramento(quadrangle 1:250,000 scale)
Hydrologic units (watersheds)
Upper Mokelumne(hydrologic unit)
San Joaquin(hydrologic accounting unit)
San Joaquin(hydrologic subregion)
California(hydrologic region)
| Country | State | County |
|---|---|---|
| United States | California | Amador |
| Meridian | Township | Range | Section | Fraction | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mount Diablo | 007N | 012E | 13,14,15, 22,23,24, 25,26,27 | California |
| Commodity | Importance |
|---|---|
| Gold | Primary |
| Materials | Type of material |
|---|---|
| Gold | Ore |
| Quartz | Gangue |
| Model code | 119 |
|---|---|
| USGS model code | 39a |
| Deposit model name | Placer Au-PGE |
| Mark3 model number | 54 |
| Host or associated | Host | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rock type | Unconsolidated Deposit > Sand and Gravel | ||
| |||
| (1) | -120.63129, 38.44251 |
|---|
| Type of structure | Regional |
|---|---|
| Structure description | Calaveras-Shoofly thrust fault, Melones Fault zone |
| General form | Irregular, lens |
|---|
| Operation type | Surface |
|---|---|
| Development status | Past Producer |
| Commodity type | Metallic |
| Significant | Yes |
| Discovery year | 1848 |
| District name | Volcano |
|---|
| Ownership category | Private |
|---|---|
| Area name | Amador County Planning dept. |
Clark, W. B., 1970, Gold districts of California: California Divisions of Mines and Geology Bulletin 193, p. 126-127.
Carlson, D.W., and Clark, W.B., 1954, Amador County, placer gold: California Journal of Mines and Geology, v. 50, pp. 197-200.
Haley, C.S., 1923, Gold placers of California: California Mining Bureau Bulletin 92, pp. 146-147.
Koschmann, A.H., and Bergendahl, M.H., 1968, Principal gold-producing districts in the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 610, p. 58
Zimmerman, J.E., 1983, The Geology and structural evolution of a portion of the Mother Lode Belt, Amador County, California: unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Arizona, 138 p.
| Subject category | Comment text |
|---|---|
| Deposit | Volcano district produced largely from typical Tertiary auriferous gravels of the ancestral Mokelumne River. While little information is available about the specific placer deposits of the ancestral Mokelumne River, much has been written about the more abundant and productive placers deposited by the contemporary ancestral American and Yuba Rivers in El Dorado, Placer, and Sierra counties. Ores consisted of Eocene channel lag and bench gravels deposited on the eroded bedrock surface and later elevated and exposed by uplift and downcutting of more recent drainages. Throughout most of the northern Sierra, the Eocene bedrock gravels were overlain by recurrent eruptive rhyolitic flows and tuffs of the Valley Springs formation. Between these events, new drainages were established, often scouring into and eroding older bedrock auriferous gravels and incorporating placer gold particles into their own "intervocanic" channel deposits. The best gravels were those deposited directly on bedrock and derived from the erosion of bedrock gold bearing quartz veins. These gravels were recognized by the abundance of quartz and metamorphic bedrock fragments, the latter imparting a bluish cast to the gravels. Deposits included gravels, cobbles, and quartz boulders. Pay zones were commonly erratic, but often meandered from one side of the channel to the other reflecting relict current velocities. Gold particles tended to be flat or rounded and ranged from fine flour gold to large nuggets. A little fine or flour gold was found in the sands and clays that covered the gravels. Younger intervolcanic channel gravels were often barren, and almost always less rich than the bedrock gravels, their gold content being largely a function of how deeply the scoured. |
| Type | Date | Name | Affiliation | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporter | 01-JAN-2007 | Downey, Cameron (Higgins, Chris, T.) | California Geological Survey CGS (Formerly CDMG) | |
| Editor | 01-SEP-2007 | Schruben, Paul G. | U.S. Geological Survey | Converted from S&A FileMaker format to Oracle. Edit checks on rocks, units, and ages with Geolex search, and other fields. |
Supplemental information added by qvyshift.com. Not part of the original USGS MRDS record.
These are landing pages for further research — the state agencies don't currently expose per-mine deep links.