Victor

Prospect in Alaska, United States with commodities Copper, Gold
Sections on this page
  1. Identification information
  2. Geographic coordinates
  3. Site location context
  4. Geographic areas
  5. Commodities
  6. Materials information
  7. Alteration
  8. Mineral occurrence model information
  9. Nearby scientific data
  10. Economic information about the deposit and operations
  11. Mining district
  12. Links to other databases
  13. Bibliographic references
  14. General comments
  15. Reporter information

Geologic information

Identification information

Deposit ID 10308543
Record type Site
Current site name Victor

Geographic coordinates

Geographic coordinates: -149.38334, 67.62971 (WGS84)
Relative position The Victor prospect is at an elevation of about 4,300 feet in the hills between Big Spruce Creek and Mathews River. It is approximately 8 miles north-northeast of the north end of Bob Johnson Lake (formerly Big Lake) and 4 miles northwest of the confluence of Big Spruce Creek and Bettles River (NW1/4 sec. 5, T. 32 N., R. 8 W. and SE1/4 sec. 32, T. 33 N., R. 8 W., of the Fairbanks Meridian). The Victor prospect was part of a large claim group that encompassed the Venus (CH065) and Eva (CH063) prospects, and the Victor prospect is approximately 1 1/2 miles west of the Venus prospect. The location is accurate within a 1/2-mile radius.

Site location context

Political divisions (FIPS codes)

Yukon-Koyukuk(Census area)

Alaska(state)

United States(country)

North America(continent)

Land(continent)

USGS map quadrangles

Chandalar C-5(quadrangle 1:63,360 scale)

Chandalar N(quadrangle 1:100,000 scale)

Chandalar(quadrangle 1:250,000 scale)

Hydrologic units (watersheds)

Alaska(hydrologic region)

Federal lands

Doyon, Limited(ANCSA Region)

ANCSA Region NTVPIC(Type of land area)

NTVPIC(Federal land areas administered by NTVPIC)

Geographic areas

Country State
United States Alaska

Commodities

Commodity Importance
Copper Primary
Gold Secondary

Materials information

Materials Type of material
Bornite Ore
Chalcocite Ore
Chalcopyrite Ore
Magnetite Ore
Molybdenite Ore
Quartz Gangue

Alteration

  • Propylitic and sericitic alteration in Devonian(?) meta-granodiorite. Associated skarns exhibit retrograde alteration related to proximity to the altered intrusives.

Mineral occurrence model information

Model code 58
USGS model code 18a
Deposit model name Porphyry Cu, skarn-related
Mark3 model number 9

Nearby scientific data

(1) -149.38334, 67.62971

Economic information

Comments on the geologic information

  • Geologic Description = The Victor and Venus (CH065) prospects both are in a terrane of altered Devonian(?) meta-granodiorite and contact-related garnet-pyroxene skarns developed in adjacent marbles and calc-schists. Alteration of the meta-granodiorite at Venus appears to be more intense than at Victor, which is characterized by propylitic and sericitic, but not potassic, alteration (Nicholson, 1990). Mineralization at the Victor prospect apparently is more prevalent in the skarns than in the meta-igneous rocks (Nicholson, 1990). Minerals in the skarns are retrograded and have been sketchily described as garnet, clinopyroxene, actinolite, epidote, calcite, quartz, chlorite, chalcopyrite, plus or minus bornite?, and pyrite (Nicholson, 1990). A hand specimen from the Victor prospect, described in Newberry and others (1986), yielded values of 1.1 percent Cu, 5.5 ppm Ag, less than 0.14 ppm Au, and negligible Pb and Zn. Young and others (1997) reported that hundreds of meters (presumably in drill intercepts) with grades of 0.1 to 0.6 percent Cu have been found on the property, with some values as high as 5.5 percent Cu, 150 ppm Mo, and 0.41 ppm Au. Nicholson (1990) noted that some workers have characterized the mineralization in the Big Spruce Creek area as volcanogenic in origin. Although Young and others (1997) discuss the Victor prospect as a porphyry copper deposit, their comments may more broadly encompass the Victor-Venus-Eva prospects.
  • Age = Devonian based on reported Early Devonian Pb/Pb zircon ages from the associated Baby Creek batholith and Horace Mountain plutons (Dillon and others, 1996)

Economic information about the deposit and operations

Development status Prospect
Commodity type Metallic

Comments on exploration

  • Status = Inactive

Mining district

District name Koyukuk

Comments on the reserve resource information

  • Reserves = Nicholson (1990) estimated that skarn pods at Victor and Eva contain 50,000 tons of 2 percent Cu. She notes that comparisons with tonnages of other porphyry copper-related skarns and the presence of extensive calcareous rocks in the area suggest appreciable undiscovered skarn mineralization. Young and others (1997) give a range of 74,000 tons to 4.56 million tons as an aggregate resource figure.

Comments on the workings information

  • Workings / Exploration = At least 23 claims staked from 1967 to 1970.

Reference information

Bibliographic references

Comments on the references

  • Primary Reference = Nicholson, 1990

General comments

Subject category Comment text
Deposit Model Name = Porphyry Cu, skarn-related deposits(?) (Cox and Singer, 1986; model 18a)
Deposit Other Comments = See also: Venus (CH065), Eva (CH063), and Evelyn Lee (CH059) prospects. Most of the publications describing this area provide a combined description of the Venus-Victor-Eva prospects. The land (and presumably the original claims) have been acquired by Doyon, Limited via its Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act selections. Bornite and chalcopyrite reportedly have been sighted in cliffs along Mathews River (DeYoung, 1978, loc. 72). That mineralization is possibly on the Victor and/or Eva prospects.

Reporter information

Type Date Name Affiliation Comment
Reporter 17-NOV-1999 J.M. Britton U.S. Geological Survey

Beyond USGS

Supplemental information added by qvyshift.com. Not part of the original USGS MRDS record.

Authoritative Alaska resources

These are landing pages for further research — the state agencies don't currently expose per-mine deep links.