| Deposit ID | 10310709 |
|---|---|
| Record type | District |
| Current site name | Masonic District |
| Alternate or previous names | Success, Chemung, Gold Fund, Home View, Lakeview (Lake View), Maybell, Melor, Perini (Perrini), Pittsburg Liberty, Red Rock, Rough-and-Ready, Serita (Sarita), Valley View, New York, Jump-Up-Joe, Lost Horse |
| Geographic coordinates: | -119.12444, 38.3575 (WGS84) |
|---|---|
| Elevation | 2620 |
| Location accuracy | 100(meters) |
| Relative position | The approximate center of the Masonic District is at the top of New York Hill, which is about 12 miles north-northwest of the historic gold mining town of Bodie and 11 miles northeast of Bridgeport. |
Political divisions (FIPS codes)
Mono(county)
California(state)
United States(country)
North America(continent)
Land(continent)
USGS map quadrangles
Dome Hill(quadrangle 1:24,000 scale)
Bridgeport(quadrangle 1:100,000 scale)
Walker Lake(quadrangle 1:250,000 scale)
Hydrologic units (watersheds)
East Walker(hydrologic unit)
Walker(hydrologic accounting unit)
Central Lahontan(hydrologic subregion)
Great Basin(hydrologic region)
Federal lands
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest(National Forest)
National Forest FS(Type of land area)
FS(Federal land areas administered by FS)
| Country | State | County |
|---|---|---|
| United States | California | Mono |
| Meridian | Township | Range | Section | Fraction | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mount Diablo | 006N | 026E | 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30 | California |
| Commodity | Importance |
|---|---|
| Gold | Primary |
| Silver | Primary |
| Copper | Tertiary |
| Lead | Tertiary |
| Mercury | Tertiary |
| Arsenic Critical | Tertiary |
| Antimony Critical | Tertiary |
| Bismuth Critical | Tertiary |
| Materials | Type of material |
|---|---|
| Gold | Ore |
| Telluride | Ore |
| Galena | Ore |
| Argentite | Ore |
| Bornite | Ore |
| Chalcopyrite | Ore |
| Famatinite | Ore |
| Enargite | Ore |
| Malachite | Ore |
| Chrysocolla | Ore |
| Stibnite | Ore |
| Cinnabar | Ore |
| Telluride | Ore |
| Barite | Ore |
| Chalcedony | Gangue |
| Quartz | Gangue |
| Opal | Gangue |
| Hematite | Gangue |
| Limonite | Gangue |
| Gypsum | Gangue |
| Barite | Gangue |
| Jarosite | Gangue |
| Chlorite | Gangue |
| Epidote | Gangue |
| Albite | Gangue |
| Montmorillonite | Gangue |
| Illite | Gangue |
| Sericite | Gangue |
| Adularia | Gangue |
| Calcite | Gangue |
| Sulfur | Gangue |
| Model code | 154 |
|---|---|
| USGS model code | 25e |
| Deposit model name | Epithermal quartz-alunite Au |
| Mark3 model number | 38 |
| Host or associated | Host | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rock type | Volcanic Rock (Aphanitic) > Intermediate Volcanic Rock > Andesite | ||||
| Rock unit name | Red Wash Volcanics | ||||
| |||||
| Host or associated | Host | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rock type | Volcanic Rock (Aphanitic) > Mafic Volcanic Rock > Basalt | ||||
| Rock unit name | Red Wash Volcanics | ||||
| |||||
| Host or associated | Host | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rock type | Plutonic Rock > Granitoid > Granite | ||
| Rock unit name | Masonic Mountain Granodiorite | ||
| |||
| Host or associated | Associated | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rock type | Metamorphic Rock | ||
| |||
| Host or associated | Associated | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rock type | Volcanic Rock (Aphanitic) | ||||
| |||||
| (1) | -119.12444, 38.3575 |
|---|
| General form | Lenticular masses, zones or "ledges" ("ledges" follows the usage of Ransome, 1909, for ore bodies at Goldfield, Nevada) |
|---|
| Operation type | Surface-Underground |
|---|---|
| Development status | Past Producer |
| Commodity type | Metallic |
| Deposit size | Small |
| Significant | Yes |
| Discovery year | 1902 |
| District name | Masonic District |
|---|
| Ownership category | National Forest |
|---|---|
| Area name | USFS Toiyabe National Forest |
Berger, B. R., 1987, Descriptive model of epithermal quartz-alunite Au, in Mineral Deposit Models: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1693, p. 158-159.
Boalich, E. S., 1923, Mono County, Masonic District: California State Mining Bureau Report 18, p. 415-416.
Chender, M., and Fordham, W., 1983, Sarita (Project): The Minesearch Annual, California, Oregon, and Washington, Metals Economic Group, v. VIII, p. 289-291.
Chesterman, C. W., Chapman, R. H., and Gray, C. H., Jr., 1986, Geology and ore deposits of the Bodie mining district: California Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 206, 35 pages, 5 plates, 11 figures, 7 tables, 17 photographs.
Clark, W. B., 1970, Gold districts of California: California Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 193, p. 150.
Clark, W. B., 1998, Bodie District, in Gold Districts of California, Sesquicentennial Edition, California Gold Discovery to Statehood: California Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 193, p. 147-148.
Eakle, A. S., and McLaughlin, R. P., 1919, Mono County, Masonic District: California State Mining Bureau Report 15, p. 160-165.
Johnson, R. F., 1951, Geology of the Masonic mining district, Mono County, California: M.A. thesis, Univ. of Calif. Berkeley, 51 p.
King, T.V.V., Berger, B.R., Ridley, Ian, and Clark, R.N., 1996, in Green, R.O., Editor, Defining the interdependence of volcanism, tectonism, and fluid availability in the formation of epithermal mineralization at Aurora-Bodie CA/NV using AVIRIS Data: Summaries of the Sixth Annual JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop, March 4-8, 1996, Vol. 1, AVIRIS Workshop, JPL Publication 96-4, Vol. 1, p. 149-154 (also: ftp://popo.jpl.nasa.gov/pub/docs/workshops/96_docs/21.PDF)
Legend Metallurgical Laboratory, Reno, NV, 1988, Letter report in California Geological Survey Minefile Folder No. 322-6121.
Mono County Historical Society 2004 Newsletter, Masonic Mining District: http://www.cagenweb.com/com/mono/historicalsociety/2004newsletter.txt, 4 p.
North American Gold Mining Industry News, 1985, Mariah picks up option on Masonic gold property: North Am. Gold Mining Industry News, November 22, 1985, v. 3, issue 27, 2 p.
Sampson, R. J., and Tucker, W. B., 1940, Mineral resources of Mono County: California Journal of Mines and Geology, Report of State Mineralogist, v. 36, no. 2, p. 115-156.
Strachan, June 1987, Chemung Hill: unpublished consulting report, a portion of which (pp. 287-291) is in the California Geological Survey Minefile Folder No. 322-6121.
Tingley, J. V., and LaPointe, D. D., 2000, Masonic District, in The Nevada Mineral Industry 1999: Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication MI-1999, p. 22.
Whitney and Whitney web site: http://www.whitneywhitney.com/projects.shtml.
Yahoo Mining/Metals News, 12/15/1999; Elko Daily Free Press, 12/24/1999, referenced in: Masonic District in The Nevada mineral industry 1999, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication MI-1999, p. 22.
| Subject category | Comment text |
|---|---|
| Deposit | The Masonic District is characterized by Tertiary calc-alkaline volcanism occurring in a back-arc spreading environment. Pre-Cretaceous crystalline basement includes quartz-feldspar-mica schists and hornfels (amphibolite grade locally) intruded by pre-Tertiary biotite granodiorite (locally quartz monzonite) and lesser granite. Regional stratigraphic studies suggest the Fletcher Basin area, including what is now the Masonic district, received from 1000 to over 3000 feet of andesite flows, tuffs, and lahars in the early Miocene. Later Miocene and early Pliocene tuffaceous sediments added an additional 1000 to 3000 feet. The andesite tuff-andesite porphyry-andesite lahar sequence exposed on Chemung Hill is typical of the early Miocene, and the sequence is offset across the northeasterly-trending Chemung Hill structure. Northwest tilting at Masonic was most likely concurrent with the latter stages of tuffaceous deposition, and prior to mineralization. At Chemung Hill, movement along the northeast structure post-dated tilting and possibly erosion of much of the tuffaceous section, and subsequent epithermal fluids, associated with precious metals mineralization, vented onto an erosional unconformity. The fluids appear to have vented onto basal tuffaceous sediments or, if pre-mineral erosion was severe enough, perhaps onto a paleosurface with exposed, northwest-dipping Miocene andesites. In either case, that paleosurface has been eroded from the Chemung Hill area, exposing what is interpreted as the structurally-controlled "feeders" to vents of a fossil epithermal system. Opaline textures and lack of banding in the quartz veins is interpreted to indicate that the paleosurface was less than 1000 feet above the present surface of Chemung Hill. The presence of crystalline alunite in silica, and narrow kaolin selvages, combined with an observed lack of sericite in wall rocks, indicate Chemung Hill (and three other areas described in Strachan's report) is an acid sulfate epithermal system (Heald and others, 1987, p. 8; cited in Strachan, 1987, p. 5). Stratigraphy, its relation to mineralized structures, and the observed style of alteration suggest no epithermal vent-related, or paleosurface-related, disseminated gold mineralization is preserved at Chemung Hill. |
| Type | Date | Name | Affiliation | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporter | 31-AUG-2007 | Hill, Robert, L. | California Geological Survey CGS (Formerly CDMG) | |
| Editor | 20-FEB-2008 | Schruben, Paul G. | U.S. Geological Survey | Converted from S&A FileMaker format to Oracle. Edit checks on rocks, units, and ages with Geolex search, and other fields. |
Supplemental information added by qvyshift.com. Not part of the original USGS MRDS record.
These are landing pages for further research — the state agencies don't currently expose per-mine deep links.